Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Heraklit Krytyka Zmysłów

Some thoughts on the subject of congressional elections

By: Omar J. Candia Aguilar


As published in the last Latinobarometro only 14% of Peruvians has confidence in Congress, occupying last place in Latin America, below Nicaragua, Guatemala and Ecuador. If we start to rehearse a response to this unfortunate perception of support for an institution of great significance for the proper functioning of democracy, we can affirm, under the premise that "institutions are made by people," it is in the quality of the legislators who represent us. Obviously we can not generalize, there are congressmen who have served their duties diligently, but minor offenses (suspension) and low (excesses) converted scandals have filled the front pages of the press and television and radio publishers.

The supreme law in Article 90, has established that to be a Congressman only requires three conditions (i) be Peruvian by birth, (ii) be at least 25 years, and (iii) have the right to vote. Determining the Rules of the Congress, Article 2, that the Congress is the representative body of the nation, responsible for carrying out legislative functions of political control and the other established by the Constitution of the State. Ie our congressmen represent mainly perform functions, regulation, control and inter alia, appoint officials and approve the national budget and the general account.

As noted, prima face, it seems that there is no reason for consistency between the requirements that are required to be a congressman and the roles they play. Generating proposals exist to rethink the requirements for being elected to Congress. However, we must remember that in democratic states to vote those barriers were disappearing to achieve as part of the conquest of universal suffrage rights (active and passive), hence, that the vote based on census, in which they voted or were elected, only men who meet certain requirements of educational attainment, income and social class, is anachronistic and undemocratic.

therefore believe that the problem of the quality of the congress is not in the requirements for candidates, but in the absence of responsible political parties and solids that contribute to the "training" and "choice" in Tables The van has to represent, and most importantly, a true civic consciousness that allows the voter to be informed and choose Peruvian according to their criterion of consciousness, or the best candidates.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Is There Any Mp3 File In Shareaza

What is the point of democracy?

"With democracy come with democracy education, democracy will cure."

Raul Ricardo Alfonsin

Former President of Argentina

By: Omar J. Candia Aguilar

Stop and think about the usefulness of democracy could be a dialectical abstraction work, hard and for some idle. However, I think it's worth doing in a society where there is still a major public sector agnostic and indifferent to the benefits that democracy brings.

If we review the Latinobarómetro 2010, see only 61% of Latin Americans prefer democracy to any other form of government, a considerable 15% prefer an authoritarian government, 16% gives the same an authoritarian or a democratic one and 7% have no opinion whatsoever. These percentages of public perception we generate several readings. One of them, there is a sector that can not see the concept and form of democratic government, so do not know or no opinion, when consulted on the preferred form of government for them. For the other sector indifferent to democracy, they feel that government decisions will not affect them at all, or worse, that whatever form of government conditions Social not vary. In contrast to the sector it is preferable to an authoritarian government to democratic front perceive that democracy has not solved the main problems and probably a government that concentrates power can do, commonly heard "you need to solve tough the problems. "

The Barometer of the Americas, another instrument that measures the people's perception, indicates that in Peru, support for democracy has declined relative to the survey conducted in 2008, that year was support for democracy of 65.5% and in 2010 was reduced to 60.1%. This decline may be due to the inefficiency of those who govern the country to solve the problems of poverty, malnutrition, insecurity, unemployment and acts of frivolity and corruption to which we are accustomed to the ruling class.

The responsibility of supporting democracy to grow and strengthen, or quasi percentage reaches majority and Uruguay, 86.2% support for democracy, is mainly in charge who have been conducting various levels of government , to make people understand that democracy is imperfect but perfectible.

In a democracy we have the great opportunity to elect our leaders, supervise them, to express ourselves freely, to question what seems questionable, to protest against to abuse, compared with unmet demands and what is more important to uphold human rights. We must show that a strong democracy and solid, can lead us to a just, equitable and inclusive, with rights, freedoms and dignity for all its citizens, so we can paraphrase Churchill "Democracy may have problems, but it is best system of government. "