Wednesday, March 31, 2010

How Long Is Opalescence Of Good For



With Easter begins the fifty days of Easter season which ends at Pentecost.
the Octave of Easter is the first week of the fifties, is considered as if it were one day, that is, the joy of Easter Sunday lasts eight days, in traditionally baptized at the Easter Vigil, were introduced to a deeper harmony with the mystery of Christ celebrated the liturgy.

The "octave of Easter Sunday ends with the eighth, called" In albis ", because that day the newly baptized at one time deposed white dresses received the day of his baptism.




THE JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN fifty

Fifty days after the feast of Passover, the Jewish people celebrated the Feast of Booths or firstfruits that the fields had produced (Ex 23:16). This was the third Jewish month (in our current month of May). Similarly, the month of September resulted in the celebration of the harvest of the crop last year, the Feast of Tabernacles. In this way the Jewish people ritualized three feasts (Deut 16.1 to 7).

the fifty states Deuteronomy Easter (between Easter and Pentecost): "You'll have seven weeks from the day that targets the sickle to the harvest count seven weeks, and celebrate the Feast of Weeks to the Lord your God "(Deuteronomy 16: 9-10). To count seven weeks (Lv 23.15 to 22) from the day after Easter Saturday, the Jewish Pentecost always falls on Sunday.

's relationship with Easter Pentecost is evident in the Christian liturgy. At Passover commemorates the liberation salvation of Jesus Pentecost is the communication of this fact to the entire universe and humanity through the believers gathered in the new church. But the Christian festival of Easter is prolonged, as in the Jewish calendar, for fifty days.

is, in fact, eighth Sunday and a week of weeks. This period, called Eastertide or fifty Easter celebrates the risen Christ, present in the Church and the Holy Spirit, gift of the Father's promise. As Lent is a time of trial and temptation, the fifties is a sign of perfection and eternity.


TOP OF THE EIGHTH OF EASTER

When at the end of the fourth century, the original meaning of Easter fifties began to decline, began to celebrate Easter eighth in the East and West. The cycle of seven weeks old broke down into a new cycle of eight days, an eminently baptism. The eighth allowed newcomers like the delights of his baptism, extending for a week "the day the Lord has made" (Ps 117, 24). At first there were seven baptismal day. Saturday was the time when the neophytes had emerged from the white garments received in baptism. He later moved to Sunday rite, named for this reason in albis. The newly baptized were seated among the people. The eighth is called alba or white.

newly baptized neophytes or met every day this week Easter in a different basilica. As the whole week was festive Since 389, all Christians could participate in the Eucharist of the neophytes and baptismal parties remember that in previous years, had participated for the first time. In the morning there was a Mass and met afternoon to visit the baptismal font. The eighth day, usually on Monday, all Christians celebrated the anniversary of his baptism (Pascha annotinum). From this meeting came the idea of \u200b\u200bremembering the baptism every Sunday with the asperges me (outside Paschal time) or vidi aquam (at Easter time). The holiday week, which existed in the late fourth century, became three days of festivities in the tenth century Finally, Pius X in 1911 reduced the three-day festival on Sunday only.

The aim of this week was that newcomers receive the latest catechesis, called Mystagogical. The octave of Easter is thus related to the preparation for the sacraments of the newly baptized at the Easter Vigil.


THE "AGNUS DEI"

The final act of this ceremony on Saturday "in albis" and octave of Easter, was given to the neophytes of the Agnus Dei, relic and at Mass had been distributed by the pope to the cardinals and church officials, and then it, the clergy and the faithful attendees.

were the Agnus Dei medallions made with the paschal candle wax left over from the previous year, blessed and anointed with holy chrism by the Pope, and marked with the image of the Lamb, the most expressive symbol of Jesus Christ, Redeemer and Savior of the world.

XIV century rituals described the distribution ceremony: During the singing of the Agnus Dei , the pope distributes the Agnus Dei of wax on. Cardinals and prelates, placing them in their mitres. After the Holy Sacrifice, go all the couch and sit down to eat, and in between both, it describes an acolyte with a silver tray full of Agnus Dei, and says

"Lord, these are the tender lambs that we have announced the Alleluia, just out of the sources, and are beaming with clarity, alleluia." The priest then moves to the middle of the room, and repeats the same announcement, then comes closer to the Pope, and in higher pitch, repeat a third time and more expensive to post, banking, finally, the dish on the papal table. The pope then distributes the Agnus Dei to their families, priests, chaplains, the minions, and sent some as gifts. The Catholic sovereigns. "

In fact, these "Tender lambs" fresh from the baptismal font and announcing the joys of Easter, neophytes were the object that week, and especially that day, the complacency of August Pastor and the entire Christian people.

The origin of the Agnus Dei is neither a pagan or superstitious, but a Christian, and probably Roman. Does not go back beyond the ninth century. Currently, following a ceremonial sixteenth century, Pope blesses him solemnly, at the beginning of his pontificate, and then every five years, but there is another private formula which used to bless them when they are exhausted, or in any other circumstance that deems appropriate.

Their size ranges between 3 and 23 centimeters, and also the size of the image. This is the Lamb lying on the book closed with seven seals, haloed with the cross, and flaunting the banner of the Resurrection. All around is written the legend: Ecce Agnus Dei, etc. On the back is usually represented one or more saints, and there, or face, it records the name of the reigning pope. By the blessing and anointing that apply to them, the Agnus Dei are considered as holy relics, which in some churches, like the Benedictines, are shown in the main altar, the Sabbath "in albis"


LA Liturgy of the Easter Octave

All eighth days of Passover to the liturgy are as one day with Easter Sunday. Therefore, in the preface and the various embolisms of the Eucharistic Prayer in each day this week, said today (not at this time) in which the Lord conquered death.

In the passage from the Gospel of the Mass of the eighth go-without claiming on continued reading, various fragments representing as many appearances after the resurrection.

Every day this week are privileged, are equal to the solemnities of the Lord, and its own mass.

All celebrations saints are omitted, of whom not only made or commemoration.

Solemnities both universal and local match this week was moved to Monday, June 20, (if you have accumulated more than one, at the following fairs), festivals and memories, however, are ignored.

During every day this week I used the Easter Preface to the expression on this day (not "at this time.")

At the end of the Mass, Lauds and Vespers and chaired by a minister, the parting words "Go in peace" and his response adds "Alleluia, alleluia."


Should celebrate the Eucharist this week with the same signs holidays that are commonly used on Sundays (singing of the Alleluia before the Gospel, the Preface, festive garments, etc.), The sprinkling of water, however, is exclusive of Sundays.

In the Mass during the Easter week insistently invites us to contemplate the glory of the Risen spraying: in the Gospel readings are proclaimed selected pages of the four evangelists who has several appearances of the Lord.

TOP

Vitamin E Capsules Blog

CATECHISM OF JOHN PAUL II ON THE RESURRECTION THEORIES

The resurrection of Jesus Christ has changed the course of history. Life has conquered death.

faith is required to open this wonderful new horizon. Let us penetrate the thoughts and emotions that vibrate in the Easter sequence, "Yes, we are sure: in truth, Christ is risen."

Mary was a silent witness of all these events. Let us pray that we will also help us to fully accept the Easter proclamation.





RESURRECTION AS HISTORICAL FACT THAT SAYS WITNESS

Pope John Paul II, January 25, 1989

1. In today's catechesis we face the crowning truth of our faith in Christ, as documented by the New Testament, believed and lived as the central truth by the early Christian communities as fundamental transmitted by tradition, never forgotten by true Christians and deepened today, studied and preached as an essential part of the paschal mystery, along with the cross is the resurrection of Christ. From him, in effect, says the Apostles 'Creed that' the third day he rose from the dead, 'and the Nicene-Constantinopolitan states:' raised on the third day according to the Scriptures. "

is a dogma of the Christian faith, which is inserted into an event happened and verified historically. Try to investigate 'the knees bent regret 'the mystery laid down by the dogma and locked in the event, beginning with an examination of biblical texts attest.

2. The first and oldest written testimony of the resurrection of Christ is found in the First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians. Here the Apostle reminds the recipients of the letter (to the Passover of 57 AD): "I handed in the first place, which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried and rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, that he appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve, then appeared to over five hundred brethren at once, of whom still live and most others died. Then he appeared to James, then to all the Apostles. And at last to me, as an abortifacient '(1 Cor 15, 3-8).

As shown, the Apostle bean here of the living tradition of resurrection, of which he had learned after his conversion at the gates of Damascus (cf. Acts 9, 3) 18). During his trip to Jerusalem he met the Apostle Peter, and with James, as stated in the Letter to the Galatians (1.18 ff.) Which has been cited as the two main witnesses of the Risen Christ.

3. It should also be noted that in the quoted text, Paul speaks not only of the resurrection occurred on the third day "according to the Scriptures" (reference biblical and theological dimension plays the fact), but at the same time used the witnesses to whom Christ appeared personally. It is a sign, among others, that the faith of the first community of believers, as expressed by Paul in Corinthians, is based on the witness of concrete men known to Christians and that much still lived among them . These "witnesses of the resurrection of Christ (cf. Acts 1, 22), sounding all the Twelve Apostles, but not only them: Paul speaks of the appearance of Jesus even more five hundred people at a time, in addition to the appearances to Peter and James and the Apostles.

4. Against this Pauline text admissibility lose all the hypotheses which have been treated in different ways, to interpret the resurrection of Christ abstracting the physical order, so that was not recognized as a historic event, for example, the hypothesis, as which the resurrection will not be anything but a kind of interpretation of the state in which Christ is after death (state of life, not death), or other assumptions that reduces the influence that Christ resurrection, after death, he continued to exercise (and even resumed with new and irresistible force) on his disciples. These assumptions seem to imply a bias to reject the reality of the resurrection, seeing it as 'product' of the environment, or community of Jerusalem. Or the interpretation or bias are checking the facts. St. Paul, by contrast, uses the text quoted eyewitnesses of the 'fact': their belief in the resurrection of Christ, is both an experimental basis.

is linked to that argument 'ex factis', which we chose and followed by the Apostles in this very first community of Jerusalem. Indeed, when it comes to the election of Matthias, one of the most devoted disciples of Jesus, to complete the number of 'Twelve' was left incomplete at the betrayal and death of Judas Iscariot, the Apostles require as a condition that it was chosen not only 'companion' of them in the period in which Jesus taught and acted, but above all to be 'a witness to his resurrection' through the experience in the days before the time when Christ (as they say) 'was promoted to heaven with us' (Acts 1, 22).

5. Therefore can not present the resurrection, as some critics do neostestamentaria little respect for the historical data as a 'product' of the early Christian community of Jerusalem. The truth about the resurrection is not a product of the faith of the Apostles and other disciples pre-or post-Easter. The text is rather that faith 'pre-Easter' of the followers of Christ was being tested radical passion and death on the cross of his Master. He himself had announced the test, especially with words to Simon Peter when he was at the gates of the tragic events in Jerusalem, 'Simon, Simon! Satan has requested he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail "(Lk 22, 31-32). The jolt caused by the passion and death of Christ was so great that the disciples (at least some of them) initially did not believe the news of the resurrection. In the Gospels we find the proof. Lucas, in particular, tells us that when the women, 'returning from the tomb, they announced all these things (ie, the empty tomb) to the eleven and all others ... all these words seemed to them as nonsense and not they believed "(Lk 24, 9. 11).

6. Moreover, the hypothesis that want to see in the Resurrection a 'product' of the faith of the Apostles is also refuted by what is referred to as the Risen 'in person appeared in their midst and said: Peace be with you. " They, in fact, 'they had seen a ghost. At that time Jesus himself had to overcome his doubts and fears and convince them that 'was',' Touch me and see that a spirit has not flesh and bones as you see I have. " And since they 'did not fully believe it and were amazed' Jesus said to give him something to eat and 'I did eat before them "(cf. Lk 24.36-43).

7. It is also well known episode of Thomas, who was not with the other apostles when Jesus came to them for the first time, entering the upper room although the door was closed (cf. Jn 20, 19). When, on his return, other disciples said: 'We have seen the Lord, "Thomas said wonder and disbelief, and said,' If I see in his hands the print of the nails and put my finger in the hole of the nails and put my hand on his side will not believe. Eight days later Jesus came again to the Upper Room, to satisfy the request of Thomas' the infidel 'and said,' Put your finger here and see my hands, and bring your hand and put it into my side, and be not faithless, but believing '. And when Thomas professed his faith with the words' My Lord and my God ', Jesus said,' Because you have seen me you believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe "(Jn 20, 24-29).

The call to believe, without trying to see what is hidden by the mystery of God and of Christ, remains still valid, but the difficulty of the Apostle Thomas to support the resurrection without having personally experienced the living presence of Jesus, and then happen given the evidence that provided the same Jesus, which is confirmed in the Gospels about the strength of the apostles and the disciples to accept the resurrection.

why not hold up the hypothesis that the resurrection has been a 'product' of faith (or credulity) of the Apostles. His faith in the resurrection was born, on the contrary (low to action of divine grace) of the direct experience of the reality of the risen Christ.

8. It's the same Jesus who, after the resurrection, comes in contact with the disciples to give them the sense of reality and dispel the view (or fear) that it was a 'ghost' and therefore they were victims of an illusion. Indeed, establishing direct relations with them, just by touch. So in the case of Thomas, just remember, but also at the meeting described in the Gospel of Luke, when Jesus tells the disciples frightened: 'Touch me and see that a spirit has not flesh and bones as you see I have '(24, 39). Les invited to note that the resurrection body, with which it presents to them is the same as was martyred and crucified. That body has yet at the same time new properties: it has 'spiritual fact' (and 'glorified' and therefore no longer subject to the usual limitations of material beings and thus to a human body. (In fact, Jesus enters the Upper Room although the doors were closed, comes and goes, etc..) But while the body is genuine and real. In his identity is material proof of the resurrection of Christ.

9. encounter on the road to Emmaus in the Gospel of Luke, is a fact that makes a particularly visible clear how it has matured in the minds of the disciples of the resurrection of persuasion just by contact with the risen Christ (cf. Lk 24, 15-21). Those two disciples of Jesus, who at the beginning of the road were "sad and helpless' with the memory of all that had happened to Master the day of the crucifixion and did not hide the disappointment experienced when he saw crumble hope in Him as Messiah release ('We hoped that he would be going to redeem Israel') experience after a complete transformation, when they made clear that the Unknown, with which they are spoken, Christ is precisely the same as before, and realize that He, therefore, has risen. Of all the narration is clear that the certainty of the resurrection of Jesus had made them almost new men. Not only had they bought back the faith in Christ, but were prepared to testify to the truth about his resurrection.

All these elements of the Gospel text, converged with each other, prove the fact of the resurrection, which is the foundation of the faith of the Apostles and the testimony, as discussed in the next catechesis, is at the center of his preaching.


the empty tomb and the Risen Christ ENCOUNTER

SS Juan Pablo II, 1 February, 1989

1. The profession of faith in the creed when we proclaim that Jesus Christ 'on the third day he rose from the dead', is based on the Gospel texts which, in turn, give us and make known the first preaching of the Apostles. Of these sources is that faith in the resurrection is, from the outset, a conviction based on a fact in a real event, not a myth or a 'concept', an idea invented by the Apostles or produced by the post-Easter community gathered around the Apostles in Jerusalem, to lift themselves and their sense of disillusionment consequent on the death of Christ on the cross. From the texts it all otherwise and so, as I said, this hypothesis is also critical and historically untenable. The apostles and the disciples did not invent the resurrection (and easy to understand that they were totally incapable of such action). No sign of a celebration of your personal or group that has carried them to guess a desired and expected event and project it on the opinion and the common belief as real, almost by contrast and as compensation for disappointment suffered. There is no trace of a creative process of psychological) sociological) literature even in the primitive community and the authors of the early centuries. The Apostles were the first who believed, not without strong resistance, that Christ had risen simply because they lived the resurrection as an actual event of that person to be able to convince several times with Christ alive again, over forty days. Successive generations of Christians accept that testimony, relying on the Apostles and other disciples as credible witnesses. The Christian faith in the resurrection of Christ is tied, then, a fact that has a precise historical dimension.

2. And yet, the resurrection is a truth which, in its most profound, belongs to the divine revelation: in effect, was announced in advance gradually by Christ over his messianic activity during the pre-Easter period. Often Jesus explicitly predicted that, after having suffered a lot and be executed, resurrected. Thus, in the Gospel of Mark, it is said that after the proclamation of Peter in the near Caesarea Philippi, Jesus' began to teach that the Son of Man must suffer greatly and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes be killed and resurrected three days. He talked about this openly "(Mk 8, 31-32). Also according to Mark, after the transfiguration, 'coming down the mountain when he warned them to tell anyone what they had seen until the Son of Man had risen from the dead '(Mark 9. 9). The disciples were puzzled about the meaning of this 'resurrection' and the question became, and agitated in the Jewish world, the return of Elijah (Mark 9, 11): but Jesus reaffirmed the idea that the Son of man should "suffer many things and be despised '(Mark 9, 12). After healing of the epileptic demoniac, in the path traveled almost clandestinely Galilee, Jesus takes the floor again to instruct: 'The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men will kill him and three days of dead will rise again' . 'But they do not understand what he was saying and were afraid to ask' (Mk 9 31-32). It is the second announcement of the Passion and Resurrection, which is the third, when they are on their way to Jerusalem: "Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be delivered to the chief priests and scribes, we condemn death and deliver him to the Gentiles, and make fun of him, spit, flog him and kill him, and after three days rise again "(Mk 10, 33-34).

3. We have here a prophetic anticipation of events, in which Jesus exercises its role as developer, relating the death and resurrection unified redemptive purpose, and referring to the plan God according to which foresees and predicts what 'should' happen. Jesus, therefore, makes known to the disciples amazed and even frightened some of the mystery underlying theological upcoming events, as indeed throughout his life. Other glimpses of this mystery is found in allusion to the 'sign of Jonah "(cf. Mt 12, 40) that Jesus endorsed and applied to the days of his death and resurrection, and the challenge to Jews on' reconstruction in three days the temple will be destroyed "(cf. Jn 2, 19). John notes that Jesus' speaking of the temple of his body. When raised, then, from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this, and they believed the Scripture and the words Jesus had spoken "(Jn 2: 20-21). Once again we are faced with the relationship between the resurrection of Christ and His Word, to your ads linked 'to the Scriptures. "

4. But beyond the words of Jesus, also developed by the messianic activity in the pre-Easter period shows the power available on the life and death, and consciousness of this power, as the resurrection of Jairus' daughter (Mk 5, 39-42), the resurrection of the youth of Nain (Luke 7, 12-15), and especially the resurrection of Lazarus (Jn 11, 42-44) that occurs in the fourth Gospel as a advertisement and a foreshadowing of the resurrection of Jesus. In the words addressed to Martha during this last episode there is a clear manifestation of self-consciousness of Jesus about his identity as Lord of life and death and keeper of the keys to the mystery of the resurrection: 'I am the resurrection . Whoever believes in me, though he die, will live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die "(Jn 11, 25-26).

All are words and deeds that contain various forms revealing the truth about the resurrection in the pre-Easter period.

5. In the area of \u200b\u200bthe Easter events, the first element to which we is the empty tomb. " Surely it is not itself a direct proof. In the absence of the body of Christ in the tomb where he had been placed could be explained in another way, as indeed he thought for a moment when Mary Magdalene, seeing the empty tomb, meant that some would have deducted the body of Jesus (cf. Jn 20, 15). Moreover, the Sanhedrin tried to get the word out that while the soldiers slept, the body had been stolen by the disciples. 'And they ran that version of the Jews (Matthew notes) to the present day' (Mt 28, 12-15).

Despite this, the empty tomb 'has been for all friends and enemies, an impressive sign. For people of good will its discovery was the first step toward recognizing the "fact" of the resurrection as a truth that could not be refuted.

6. That was primarily for women, that very morning had come to the tomb to anoint the body of Christ. Were the first to welcome the announcement: 'He has risen, not here ... But go, tell his disciples and Peter ... ' (Mk 16: 6-7). 'Remember how he spoke when he was still in Galilee, saying:! Is necessary that the Son of Man must be handed over to sinners and be crucified, and the third day rise again!. And they remembered his words' (Lk 24: 6-8).

women certainly were surprised and frightened (cf. Mk 24, 5). Even they were willing to surrender too easily to a fact that even predicted by Jesus, was indeed beyond any possibility of imagination and invention. But in your sensitivity and intuitive finesse them, especially Mary Magdalene, clung to the reality and ran to where the Apostles to give them the good news.

The Gospel of Matthew (28, 8-10) tells us that along the way Jesus himself met them and greeted them they renewed the mandate to carry the news to the brethren (Mt 28, 10). In this way, women were the first messengers of Christ's resurrection, and went to the same Apostles (Lk 24, 10). Done eloquently about the importance of women and in the days of the Easter event!

7. Among those who received the announcement of Mary Magdalene were Peter and John (cf. Jn 20, 3-8). They came to the tomb, not without hesitation, so much so that Mary had spoken of the body being removed from the tomb of Jesus (cf. Jn 20, 2). Arrived at the grave, also found it empty. Ended up believing, after hesitation, because, as John says, 'did not yet understand the scripture, that he must rise from the dead "(Jn 20, 9).

Let's face it: the fact was amazing for those men who were at much too superior to them. The same difficulty, showing the traditions of the event, giving it a fully consistent relationship confirms his extraordinary and disturbing impact it had on the minds of the fortunate witnesses. The reference to 'Scripture' is proof of the dark perception had to be faced with a mystery about the Disclosure could only give birth.

8. However, here is another fact to be considered good: if the empty tomb 'stupefied at first sight and could even generate suspicion is correct, the gradual understanding of this initial event, as recorded in the Gospels, ultimately led to the discovery of the truth of the resurrection.

Indeed, we are told that women, and on the Apostles, were faced with a 'sign' particular: the sign of victory over death. If the same tomb closed by a heavy stone, testify to the death, the empty tomb and the stone removed gave the first announcement that there had been beaten to death.

can not fail to impress the consideration of the mood of the three women who went to the tomb at dawn, they said among themselves: 'Who will roll away the stone the door of the tomb? " (Mk 16, 3), and then, when they reached the tomb with great wonder found that 'the stone had been rolled back but was great' (Mk 16, 4). According to the Gospel of Mark found in the tomb to one who gave the announcement of the resurrection (cf. Mk 16, 5), but they were afraid and, despite the claims of the young man dressed in white, 'they fled from the tomb , for trembling and astonishment had come upon them "(Mk 16, 8). How can we not understand? Yet the comparison with the parallel texts of the other evangelists can say that, even fearful, the women carried the announcement of the resurrection, which the empty tomb 'with stone run was the first sign.

9. For women and for the Apostles the lead of 'sign' is concluded by the encounter with the Risen Lord: even then the perception becomes timid and uncertain in conviction and, indeed, in faith in Him who "is truly risen" . So it was for women to see Jesus in his way and listen to your greeting, were thrown at his feet and worshiped him (cf. Mt 28, 9). That's what happened especially to Mary Magdalene, who upon hearing that Jesus called his name, gave him above all the usual nickname: Rabbuni, Master! (Jn 20, 16) and when he lit on the Paschal Mystery radiant ran to carry the news to his disciples: '! have seen the Lord! " (Jn 20, 18). The same happened to the disciples in the Upper Room the evening of that 'first day of the week', when they were finally from Jesus, they were happy about the new certainty that he had entered his heart, 'was pleased to see the Lord "(cf. Jn 20.19-20).

Direct contact with Christ triggers the spark that jumps the faith!


Appearances of the Risen Jesus

Pope John Paul II, February 22, 1989 1

. We know the passage First Corinthians, where Paul, the first chronologically, write the truth about the resurrection of Christ: "I delivered ... As my turn had received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried and rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, that he appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve ... '(1 Cor 15.3-5). It is, as we see, of a truth transmitted, received and transmitted again. A truth that belongs to the 'deposit of revelation "that Jesus himself, through his apostles and evangelists, has left his church.

2. Jesus gradually revealed this truth in his pre-Easter teaching. Later it found its realization in the events of the Passover of Christ Jerusalemite, certificates historically, but full of mystery.

Ads and confirmation were made especially in the meetings of the risen Christ, the Gospels and Paul tell. Needless to say, the Pauline text presents these meetings (in which the risen Christ reveals himself) in a comprehensive and synthetic (adding to one's final encounter with the Risen Lord to the gates of Damascus: cf. Acts 9, 3-6). The Gospels are, in this regard, rather fragmented entries.

is not difficult to make and compare some characteristic lines each of these occurrences and to bring us together even more to discover the meaning of the revealed truth.

3. We note first that, after the resurrection, Jesus appears to women and the disciples with his body transformed, spiritual fact and engaged in the glory of the soul, but no triumphant feature. Jesus reveals to a great simplicity. Speaking friend to friend, with whom he is in the ordinary circumstances of life on earth. He would not confront his adversaries, assuming a winning attitude, or has been concerned to show his 'superiority', and even fewer wanted to strike him down. Has even has been submitted to any of them. All that tells us the Gospel leads us to exclude that have appeared, for example, to Pilate, who had delivered him to the chief priests to be crucified (cf. Jn 19, 16), or Caiaphas, who had torn vestments by the affirmation of his divinity (cf. Mt 26, 63-66).

the privileges of his appearances, Jesus makes his identity known in physics: that face, those hands, those features that they knew very well, that side which had been transferred, that voice they had heard so many times. Only in the encounter with Paul in the vicinity of Damascus, the light that surrounds the risen nearly blinded the burning persecutor of Christians and thrown to the ground (cf. Acts 9, 3-8), but is a manifestation of the power of him who, and ascended into heaven, impress a man who wants to make an 'instrument of choice' ( Acts 9, 15), a missionary of the Gospel.

4. Also of note is a significant fact: Jesus Christ appeared first to women, their faithful followers, and not to the disciples, and not even the Apostles themselves, although it had chosen to carry the Gospel to the world . It is women who first hoped the mystery of his resurrection, making them the first witnesses of this truth. You may want to reward their delicacy, sensitivity to your message, your strength, that had led to Calvary. Maybe he wants to express a delicate feature of their humanity, which is a kindness and gentleness with which it approaches and benefits to people who have less in the great world of his time. It is what it seems you can conclude from the text of Matthew: "In this, Jesus met them (the women who ran to communicate the message to the disciples) and said:! God save you!. And they came and took hold of his feet and worshiped him. Then Jesus said to them: Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee, and there I see! " (28, 9-10).

also the story of the emergence Mary Magdalene (Jn 20, 11-18) is of extraordinary fineness either by the woman, who says all his passionate and measured delivery to follow Jesus, either by the Master, who treats her with exquisite delicacy and benevolence.

this priority of women in the Easter events will take inspiration from the Church, which over the centuries has benefited greatly from them for their life of faith, prayer and apostolate.

5. Some characteristics of these post-Easter meetings make them, in a sense, paradigmatic because spiritual situations, how often are created in man's relationship with Christ, when one feels called or 'Visited' by Him First we

an initial difficulty in recognizing Christ by those to whom he goes to meet, as seen in the case of the same Magdalene (Jn 20, 14-16) and of the disciples of Emmaus (Lk 24, 16). Not lack a certain feeling of awe before Him He loves, he seeks, but, at the time it is found, there is a certain hesitation ...

But Jesus gradually leads to recognition and faith, both to Mary Magdalene (Jn 20.16), as the disciples of Emmaus (Lk 24, 26 et seq.), And similarly, other disciples (cf. Lk 24, 25) 48). Sign of patient teaching of Christ to reveal Himself to man, to attract, to make, to bring the knowledge of the riches of his heart and salvation.

6. It is interesting to analyze the psychological process that hint at the different meetings: the disciples experience some difficulty in recognizing not only the truth of the resurrection, but also the identity of one who is before them, and appears to be the same but at the same time as another, a Christ 'transformed'. It is not easy for them to make immediate identification. They sense, yes, Jesus, but at the same time feel that he is no longer in the previous condition, and before him are full of reverence and fear.

Where, then, realize, with your help, that there is another, but to the same transformer, they suddenly appear on a new discovery capability, intelligence, charity and faith. It's like an awakening of faith: 'Did not our hearts burning within us while he talked on the way to us the Scriptures? " (Lk 24, 32). 'My Lord and my God' (Jn 20, 28). "I have seen the Lord '(Jn 20, 18). Then an entirely new light in his eyes light up even the event of the cross, and give the true and full sense of the mystery of suffering and death, which ends in the glory of new life! This will be one of the main elements of the message of salvation The Apostles have been from the beginning to the Jewish people, and little by little, of all nations.

7. We must emphasize one last feature of the apparitions of the Risen Christ: in them, especially in the past, Jesus makes the final delivery to the apostles (and the Church) of the mission of evangelizing the world to bring the message of His Word and gift of His grace. Remind

appearance to the disciples in the Upper Room on the evening of Easter: "As the Father sent me, I am sending you ..." (Jn 20, 21), and gives them the power to forgive sins!

And in the appearance in the sea of \u200b\u200bGalilee, followed the miraculous catch and announces that symbolizes fruitfulness of the mission, it is clear that Jesus wants to guide their spirits to the work that awaits them (cf. Jn 21.1 to 23). Confirmed the final allocation of the particular task to Peter (Jn 21, 15) 18): 'Do you love me? ... You know I love you ... Feed my sheep ... Feed my sheep ...'.

John indicates that 'this was the third time Jesus appeared to the disciples after rising from the dead' (Jn 21:14). This time, they not only had become aware of their identity: 'Is the Lord' (Jn 21, 7), but had realized that everything had happened and was happening in those days of Easter, they pledged to each of them (and most particularly to Peter) in the construction of the new era of history, which had its beginning on that Easter morning.


RESURRECTION culmination of the revelation

SS Juan Pablo II 8 March, 1989

1. In the Letter of Paul to the Corinthians, recalled several times throughout these reflections on the resurrection of Christ, we read these words of the Apostle: "But Christ was raised, our preaching is empty, empty is your faith '(1 Cor 15, 14). Clearly, Paul sees the resurrection the foundation of Christian faith and almost keystone of the whole edifice of doctrine and life built on revelation as final confirmation of the whole of the truth that Christ brought. Therefore, all the preaching of the Church from apostolic times through the centuries and all the generations, until today, refers to the resurrection and takes out the driving force, persuasive, and its force. It is easy to understand why.

2. The resurrection was the first confirmation of all that Christ had done and taught ú '. It was the divine seal put on his words and his life. He had himself indicated to the disciples and adversaries this sure sign of its truth. The angel of the tomb the women remembered the morning of the 'first day of the week': 'He is risen, as he said "(Mt 28, 6). If this word and his promise was revealed to be true also all other words and promises have the power of truth that does not pass, as he himself had proclaimed: "Heaven and earth will pass away but my words shall not pass' (Mt 24 , 35, Mark 13, 31, Luke 21, 33). Nobody could have imagined or pretend most authoritative evidence, stronger, more decisive than the resurrection from the dead. All true, too the most inaccessible to the human mind are, however, justification, even in the realm of reason, if the risen Christ has given the ultimate test, promised by him, of his divine authority.

3. Thus the resurrection confirms the truth of their own divinity. Jesus had said: 'When you lift up (on the cross) the Son of man, then you will know that I am' (Jn 8, 28). Those who heard these words they wanted to stone Jesus, because 'I AM' was for Jews the equivalent of the ineffable name of God. In fact, asking Pilate had his death sentence as the main charge of having "made himself the Son of God '(Jn 19, 7). For the same reason he had condemned in the council as guilty of blasphemy after he said he was the Christ, the Son of God, after the interrogation of high priest (Mt 26, 63-65, Mk 14, 62, Lk 22 70): ie not only the Messiah site as designed and expected by the Jewish tradition, but the Messiah announced by the Lord Psalm 109/110 (cf. Mt 22, 41 et seq.), the mysterious character envisioned by Daniel ( 7, 13-14). This was the great blasphemy, the charge for the death sentence, having proclaimed the Son of God! And now his resurrection confirmed the truth of his divine identity and legitimized the allocation made to Himself, before Easter, 'name' of God, 'Verily, verily I say unto you before Abraham was, I am' (Jn 8, 58). For Jews this was a claim that he deserved stoning (cf. Lev 24, 16), and, indeed, 'took up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and left the temple' (Jn 8, 59). But if they could not stoned, then managed to 'lift' on the cross, the resurrection of the crucified showed, however, it was truly I am, the Son of God.

4. In fact, Jesus even calling himself the Son of man, not only confirmed to be the true Son of God, but in the Upper Room before the Passion, had asked the Father to reveal the Christ the Son of man was his eternal Son, 'Father, the hour has come, glorify thy Son that the Son may glorify you' (Jn 17, 1). '... Glorify me alongside yourself with the glory I had with you before the world was' (Jn 17, 5). And the paschal mystery was listening to this request, confirmation of the divine sonship of Christ, and further, its glorification of the glory which 'had with the Father before the world was "the glory of the Son of God.

5. In the period pre-Easter Jesus in the Gospel of John, he alluded several times to the future glory that is manifested in his death and resurrection. The disciples understood the meaning of these words from her only when the incident occurred.

Thus we read that during the first Easter morning in Jerusalem, after being driven from the temple to the merchants and moneychangers, Jesus answered the Jews who called for a 'sign' of power by the party acting in this way: "Destroy this Temple and in three days I will raise ... He spoke of the temple of his body. When raised, then, from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this, and they believed the Scripture and the words that Jesus had said '(Jn 2.19 to 22).

the response also by Jesus to the messengers of the sisters of Lazarus, who asked to go to visit ailing brother, made reference to the events of Easter: "This sickness is not death, is for the glory of God, the Son of God may be glorified "(Jn 11, 4).

was not only the glory he could report to you the miracle, especially since they cause his death (cf. Jn 11, 46) 54), but its true glorification come precisely from his elevation on the cross (cf. Jn 12 32). The disciples understood this very well after the resurrection.

6. Particularly interesting is the doctrine of St. Paul on the value of the resurrection as a determinant of conception in Christ, also linked to his personal experience of the Risen. Thus, at the beginning of the Epistle to the Romans presents: 'Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which he promised through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures, concerning his Son , was descended from David according to the flesh, Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead our Lord Jesus Christ '(Rom 1, 1-4).

This means that from the first moment of human conception and birth (from the lineage of David), Jesus was the eternal Son of God who became Son of man. But in the resurrection, the divine sonship was manifested in all its fullness with the power of God by the Holy Spirit, Jesus returned to life (cf. Rom 8, 11) and was in the glorious state of ' Kyrios "(cf. Phil 2: 9-11, Romans 14, 9, Acts 2, 36), so that Jesus deserves a new title recognition messianic, worship, the glory of the eternal name of the Son of God (cf . Acts 13, 33, Hb 1.1 to 5, 5, 5).

7. Paul had expressed the same doctrine in the synagogue of Antioch of Pisidia, on Saturday, when invited by the heads of the same, took the floor to announce that at the height of the economy of salvation accomplished in the history of Israel between light and shadow, God had raised from the dead Jesus, which had appeared for many days to those who came up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who were now his witnesses to the people. 'Also we (concluded the Apostle) to you the Good News that the promise made to the parents God has fulfilled to us their children by raising Jesus, as written in the Psalms: You are my son, I will I have begotten you "(Acts 13, 32-33; cf. Ps 2, 7).

For Paul there is a kind of osmosis between the glory conceptual the resurrection of Christ and the eternal divine sonship of Christ, which is fully revealed in the victorious conclusion of his messianic mission.

8. In the glory of 'Kyrios' manifests the power of the Risen (Man-God), that Paul knew from experience at the time of his conversion on the road to Damascus to feel called to be an apostle (not one of the Twelve) being an eyewitness to the living Christ, and received from him the strength to face all the work and bear all the sufferings of his mission. Paul's spirit was so marked by this experience, in her doctrine and in his testimony puts the power of the Risen idea of \u200b\u200bsharing the the sufferings of Christ, that it was also pleasing: What had made in his personal experience also proposed to the faithful as a rule of thought and a rule of life: "I count everything as loss because of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord ... gain Christ and be found in him ... and know him the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, trying to get to the resurrection from the dead "(Phil 3: 8-11). And then his thoughts turn to the road to Damascus experience '... Having been myself, because Christ Jesus' (Phil. 3, 12).

9. Thus, referenced texts make clear that the resurrection of Christ is closely linked with the mystery of the Incarnation of the Son of God: compliance, according to the eternal plan of God. Moreover, it is the supreme crown of all that Jesus said and did in his life, from birth to the passion and death, with his works, miracles, teaching, example of a perfect life, and especially with his transfiguration. He never directly revealed the glory he had received from the Father 'before the world was' (Jn 17, 5), but hid the glory with his humanity, until finally emptied (cf. Phil 2, 7-8 ) with death on the cross. In

the resurrection was revealed that "in Christ the whole fullness of the Godhead bodily" (Col 2, 9, cf. 1, 19). Thus the resurrection 'complete' the manifestation of the contents of the Incarnation. So we can say that it is also the fullness of Revelation. Therefore, as we said, it is at the heart of Christian faith and the preaching of the Church


the salvific value of RESURRECTION

Pope John Paul II, March 15, 1989

1. If, as we have seen in previous catechesis, Christian faith and the preaching of the Church are rooted in the resurrection of Christ, since this is the final confirmation and completeness of disclosure, we should also add that is the source of the saving power of the Gospel and the Church as the integration of the paschal mystery. According to Paul, Jesus Christ has been revealed as "Son of God in power according to the spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead '(Rom 1, 4). And transmits to men the holiness because 'was delivered for our sins and was raised for our justification "(Rom 4, 25). There is a double aspect in the paschal mystery of death for freedom from sin and resurrection to open up access to new life.

Certainly the paschal mystery as life and work of Christ, has a deep internal unity redemptive role and its effectiveness, but this does not prevent the various aspects can be distinguished with regard to the effects that derive from it in man. Hence the attribution to the resurrection of the specific effect of the 'new life', as St. Paul says.

2. About this doctrine have to do some indications that, in constant reference to the New Testament texts, allow us to highlight all its truth and beauty.

Above all, we can certainly say that the risen Christ is the principle and source of a new life for all men. And it appears also in the wonderful prayer of Jesus the eve of his passion, John tells us with these words: "Father ... glorify thy Son that thy Son may glorify you. And according to the power that you have given over all flesh, to give eternal life to which you have given him '(Jn 17, 1-2). In his prayer Jesus looks and hugs especially his disciples who warned of the next painful separation that would be verified by his passion and death, but which also promised: "I live, you also will live" (Jn 14, 19) . Ie will have a part in my life, which will be revealed after the resurrection. But the look of Jesus extends to a radius of universal scope. He says, 'Do not pray for them (my pupils), but also by those, who through their word, believe in me ... (Jn 17, 20): everyone should be one thing to share in the glory of God in Christ.

New life given to believers under Christ's resurrection, is the victory over death, sin and a new participation in grace. St. Paul says it concisely: "God, rich in mercy ... die to our trespasses made us alive with Christ '(Eph 2, 4-5). And in the same way San Pedro: 'The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ ... His great mercy, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead will have been born anew to a living hope "(1 Pt 1, 3).

This truth is reflected in the Pauline teaching on baptism: "Therefore we are with Him (Christ) buried by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life '(Rom 6: 4).

3. This new life (life in the Spirit) said the adoption of sons: another Pauline concept of fundamental importance. In this regard, it is 'classic' the passage from the Letter to the Galatians: "God sent his Son ... to redeem those who were under the law and to receive adoption as sons' (Gal 4, 4-5). This divine adoption by the Holy Ghost, makes man like the only begotten Son: "... All who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God '' m 8, 14). In the Letter to the Galatians, St. Paul appeals to the experience of the faithful of the new condition as: 'The proof that you are sons of God is that God has sent into our hearts the Spirit of his Son who cries : Abba, Father! So you are no longer a slave but a son, and his son, then an heir through God '(Gal 4, 6) 7). So there is a new man in the first effect of the redemption: the release of slavery, but the acquisition of freedom comes to becoming an adopted son, and this not so much legal access to inheritance, but the real gift of divine life breathed into man the three Persons of the Trinity (cf . Gal 4, 6, 2 Cor 13, 13). The source of this new human life in God is the resurrection of Christ.

Participation in the new life also causes men to be 'brothers' of Christ, as Jesus calls his disciples after the resurrection: "Go and tell my brothers ..." (Mt 28, 10, Jn 20, 17). Brethren not by nature but by the gift of grace, because that adoptive filiation gives a true and real participation in the life the only begotten Son, as fully revealed in his resurrection.

4. The resurrection of Christ (and, indeed, the risen Christ) is finally beginning and source of our future resurrection. Jesus himself spoke of it to announce the institution of the Eucharist as the sacrament of eternal life, the future resurrection: "He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise the last day" (Jn 6 , 54). And the 'whisper' who heard him, Jesus replied: 'Does this offend you? And when you see the Son of Man ascend to where it was before ...?' (Jn 6, 61-62). This would indirectly indicate that under the sacramental species of the Eucharist gives those who are sharing in the Body and Blood of Christ glorified.

Paul also emphasizes the link between Christ's resurrection and ours, especially in his First Epistle to the Corinthians, he writes: 'Christ is risen from the dead, the firstfruits of those who died ... For as in Adam all die, so also all be made alive in Christ "(1 Cor 15, 20-22). 'In fact, it is necessary that this corruptible must put on incorruption and this mortal must put on immortality. And when this corruptible must put on incorruption and this mortal must put on immortality, then the saying that is written! Death has been swallowed up in victory! " (1 Cor 15, 53-54). 'Thanks be to God who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ' (1 Cor 15, 57).

The final victory over death, Christ has already achieved, the participant makes to humanity in so far as it receives the fruits of redemption. It is a process of admission to the 'new life', the 'eternal life', which lasts until the end of time. Thanks to this process is formed over the centuries a new humanity: the community of believers gathered at the Church of the Resurrection true community. In the final hour of history, all re-emerge, and those who have been in Christ, have the fullness of life in the glory, the ultimate realization of the community of the redeemed by Christ 'so that God may be all in all "(1 Cor 15, 28).

5. The Apostle also teaches that the redemptive process, culminating with the resurrection of the dead, takes place in a realm of ineffable spirituality that surpasses anything you can conceive and carry out humanely. Indeed, if on the one hand he writes that 'flesh and blood can not inherit the kingdom of heaven, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable "(1 Cor 15, 50) which is the realization of our natural inability for the new life), secondly, in the Letter to the Romans says those who believe that: 'If the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in us, He who raised Christ from the dead will give life to your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwells in you' (Rom 8, 11). It is a mysterious process of spiritualization, which also reach the bodies at the time of the resurrection by the power of the Holy Spirit wrought the resurrection of Christ.

is undoubtedly of realities that are beyond our understanding and rational demonstration, and so are the object of our faith grounded in the Word of God, which, through San Pablo, allows us to penetrate in the mystery that transcends all boundaries of space and time, '' The first man Adam became a living, the last Adam, life-giving spirit '(1 Cor 15, 45). 'And as we have borne the image of the earthly man, we shall also bear the image of the sky' (1 Cor 15, 49).

6. Pending such transcendental final fulfillment, the risen Christ lives in the hearts of his disciples and followers as a source of sanctification in the Holy Spirit, the source of divine life and divine descent, the source of the future resurrection.

This makes sure that St. Paul in the Epistle to the Galatians: "I am crucified with Christ, and not I, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God who loved me and gave Himself for me "(Gal 2, 20). As the Apostle, also every Christian, but still live in the flesh (cf. Rom 7, 5), and spiritualized live a life with faith (cf. 2 Cor 10, 3), because the living Christ, the risen Christ has become the subject of all his actions: Christ lives in me (cf. Rom 8: 2. 10) 11;. Phil 1, 21, Col 3, 3). And life in the Holy Spirit.

This certainly supports the Apostle, as it can and must support every Christian in the work and suffering of this life, as Paul advised the disciple Timothy in the fragment of a letter from him with which we close) to our knowledge and comfort) our teaching on the resurrection of Christ: "Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead, descendant of David, according to my gospel ... Therefore I endure all things for the elect, that they also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory. This saying is trustworthy: If we died with Him, we shall also live with Him if we endure, we shall also reign with Him if we deny him, also will deny us, if we are faithful, He remains faithful, for he can not deny himself ... ' (2 Tim 2, 8-13).

'Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead ': these words of the Apostle gives us the key of hope in the real life in time and eternity.




TOP

Antena Satelite Recipes



Besides being the fundamental argument for our Christian faith, the Resurrection is important for several reasons:

shows God's righteousness that exalted Christ to a life of glory, after Christ had humbled himself unto death (Philippians 2:8-9).

back with the Resurrection and Ascension into heaven, Christ completed the mystery of our salvation and redemption by his death freed us from sin and restored us by His Resurrection the most important privileges lost by sin (Rom 4.25).


By his Resurrection we acknowledge Christ as the immortal God, the efficient and exemplary cause of our own resurrection (I Cor 15.21; Fil 3.20 to 21), and as the model and support our new life of grace (Rom 6: 4-6, 9-11).

Why would fall to the ground means the evidence of the Resurrection of Christ? Four theories have attempted an explanation, though the former have few defenders today.



swoon theory

There is a theory of those who claim that Christ did not really die on the cross, that his supposed death was a temporary fading, and resurrection simply a return to consciousness. This theory was advocated by Paulus (Exegetisches Handbuch, 1842, II, p. 929) and are certain modifications by Hase (Gesch. Jesu, No 112), but not consistent with the data presented in the Gospels.

The scourging and crowning with thorns, the carrying of the cross and the crucifixion, three hours on the cross, and later launched the centurion had not led to a simple fading. Her actual death is certified by the centurion and the soldiers, by the friends of Jesus and his most bitter enemies.

His stay of 36 hours in the sealed tomb, in an atmosphere poisoned by hundreds of pounds of species would have been sufficient to cause death. Moreover, if Jesus had just returned to consciousness after vanishing, the feelings that morning had been of pity rather than of joy and triumph, the Apostles have felt more motivated to perform the duties of a sickly and weak council to apostolic mission, the life of the powerful "miracle" had ended in a blatant and shameful solitude dark, and had advocated sinlessness tornado in a silent approval of his lies as part of a stone on which rested his church.

not surprising why later critics of the resurrection, like Strauss, have rejoiced in both theory and fading to justify this criticism.


THEORY OF TAXATION

is said that the disciples stole the body of Jesus from the grave, and then proclaimed to men that their Lord had risen. This theory had been anticipated by the Jews who "gave a sum of money to the soldiers, saying: 'Say, his disciples came by night and stole him away while we slept "(Mt 28, 12ss).

The same was noted by Celsus (Origen, Against Celsus, II, 56) with some differences in detail. But to assume that the Apostles with a weight on their consciences may have preached a kingdom of truth and justice as the great effort and cause of their lives, and because of that realm have been to death, would take one of those impossibilities entities that can happen in a fit of exultation of the emotion of the moment, but had been shelved when reenter reason.


THEORY VIEW

This theory, as understood by its proponents generally do not allow visions caused by divine intervention, but only those resulting from merely human agents. Because if we accept divine intervention, we should also believe, as regards the principles, that God raised Jesus from the dead.

But where is that fall into this theory human agents who have produced such visions? The idea of \u200b\u200bresurrection from the tomb was familiar to the disciples for their Jewish faith, also had vague hints in the prophecies of the Old Testament, finally, Jesus Himself Resurrection had always associated with predictions of his death.

On the other hand, the state of mind of the disciples was a great enthusiasm, treasured the memory of Christ with such affection that made them almost impossible to think that he was gone. In short, his state of mind was such that the smallest spark needed to ignite a flame. Provided the spark of Mary Magdalene, and the flame immediately spread with the speed and strength of a conflagration. What she thought she saw, others immediately thought they had also to be seen. Their expectations were met, and the conviction that the Lord had indeed risen from the dead, he hugged members of the early Church. This is the theory of common visions advocated by critics of the Resurrection, more ingenious than it sounds, it is impossible from the point of view of history.

• It is incompatible with the state of mind of the Apostles, the theory presupposes faith and expectation on the part of the Apostles, which from the facts, faith and expectation of the apostles is the result of his vision of the risen Christ.

• It is inconsistent with the nature of the manifestation of Christ, these should have been linked to heavenly glory, or should have continued the previous relationship of intimacy between Jesus and his disciples, who in truth and in fact consistently showed a whole new phase have been impossible previously expected.

• Do not comply with the conditions of the early Christian community, after the first excitement of Easter Sunday, the Apostles as a body is characterized by cold deliberation rather than the exalted enthusiasm of a community of visionaries.

• It is incompatible with the length of time that lasted the apparitions, visions, as posed by critics, so far as is known have never lasted long, while some of the manifestations of Christ lasted a considerable period time.

• Not consistent with the fact that demonstrations have been given a large number of people simultaneously.

• Do not agree with where many of the demonstrations took place: visionary appearances would have been expected in Galilee, while most of the appearances of Jesus occurred in Judea.

• It is inconsistent with the fact that the visions ended abruptly the day of Ascension.

Keim admits that the excitement, nervousness and mental excitement from the disciples did not provide a rational explanation of the facts as related in the Gospels. According to him, the visions were granted directly by God and the glorified Christ, could include up to a "bodily appearance" for those who feared that without it would lose everything. But Keim theory satisfies neither the Church, while leaving all the evidence of a resurrection of the body of Jesus, or the enemies of the Church, since it supports many of the dogmas of the Church again is not consistent itself, it attaches to the special intervention of God as proof of the faith of the Church, despite starting denying bodily resurrection of Jesus, which is one of the main objects of this faith.


MODERN VISION

The Holy See, in the Decree "Lamentabili" describes and condemns views defended by a fourth group of opponents of the Resurrection. They propose, among other things: "The Resurrection of our Savior is not properly a fact of historical order, but a purely supernatural order or proven or probable, which Christian consciousness has been gradually inferring other facts."

This postulate is consistent with what later explained Loisy ("Autour d'un petit livre", p. 8, 120-121, 169, "L'Evangile et l'Eglise", pp. 74-78; 120-121, 171). According to Loisy, first, the entrance to the immortal life of a raised among the dead is not something that can be observed, is a supernatural, hiperhistórico fact, unable to be proven historically.

The alleged evidence for the Resurrection of Christ are inadequate, the empty tomb is just an indirect argument, while the appearances of the risen Christ are open to suspicion on a priori, sensitive to impressions of a supernatural reality, and are evidence questionable from a critical standpoint, because of discrepancies in the various scriptural narratives and diverse and mixed nature of the details related to the apparitions.

Second, if one disregards the faith of the Apostles, the testimony The New Testament does not provide a certain argument to the fact of the Resurrection. This faith of the Apostles is not so concerned with the Resurrection of Jesus Christ as in his immortal life, based on appearances, which are unsatisfactory evidence from a historical standpoint, but whose strength is perceived by faith alone, when development of the idea of \u200b\u200ba Messiah immortal, is an evolution of Christian consciousness, but at the same time a corrective to the scandal of the Cross.

The Holy See rejected this vision of the Resurrection when the sentence in the Decree "Lamentabili", "Faith in the Resurrection of Christ said from the beginning not so much the fact of Resurrection, but the immortal life of Christ with God. "

authoritative addition to the rejection of the modernist vision, we must place the following three considerations:

First, the argument that the Resurrection of Christ can not be proven historically inconsistent with science. Science does not know enough about the limitations and possibilities of a body raised from the dead to eternal life, to ensure the claim that such a body can not be perceived by the senses, again in the case of Christ, the grave Vacuum all circumstances can not be explained except by a miraculous intervention of God with supernatural character such as the Resurrection of Jesus.

Second, history allows us to refer to the Resurrection as a result of a gradual evolution of Christian consciousness. The appearances were not a mere projection of the messianic hope of the Apostles, which should be revived and strengthened with the apparitions. Again, the Apostles did not start preaching the immortal life of Christ with God, but preached Christ risen from the earliest times, emphasizing it as a fundamental fact and described to some of the details related to this fact: Acts 2, 24, 31, 3, 15.26, 4.10, 5.30, 10.39 to 40, 13.30, 37, from 17.31 to 2, Rom., 1.4, 4.25, 6, 4.9 ; 8,11,34, 10.7, 14.9, I Cor 15, 4.13 ff., Etc.

Third, the denial of the historical certainty of the Resurrection of Christ would have serious and several historical errors: it questions the objective reality of the apparitions without any historical basis for such doubt, dispute the fact of the empty tomb despite solid historical evidence for this fact, questioning even the fact of Christ's burial in the tomb of Joseph, though this fact is based on the testimony of history irrevocably.

Source: AJ MAAS in the Catholic Encyclopedia




TOP

Do Genital Herpes Appear In Your Pubic Hairs

CONTRARY TO THE TRUTH RESURRECTION OF JESUS \u200b\u200b'RESURRECTION OF THE EASTER VIGIL


If Jesus rose from the dead, then all statements are true and now we can be sure that there is life after death. The appearances of the Risen
were no subjective views, but objective facts of history. Described (in the last chapters of the gospels) as real and even carnal presence of Jesus, eat, walk, let me touch him, talk to them. They are a solid foundation of faith in the Resurrection.

Although there were no witnesses to the resurrection, if any of the Resurrection. Who saw him began to say that the "crucified was alive" and so as there is the Church can be seen, there is "evidence."




* Jesus himself predicted his death and resurrection, and these events happened exactly as he had predicted.

* This event is well documented by numerous reliable historical sources. Historians such as Josephus (C.37-110 AD), Ignatius (c.50-115 AD) Justin Martyr (c.100-165 AD) and Tertullian (c.160-220 AD) were convinced of the authenticity of the resurrection . Their writings validate the accounts of the biblical writers, who, according to biblical theologians, recorded the event as early as 37 AD and not later than 64 AD. In addition, other historians of the first and second centuries including Cornelius Tacitus, Suetonius, Plinius Secundus, and Lucian of Samosata acknowledged the impact this incredible event had on the people of that era.

* The resurrection is the only explanation for the empty grave

* There were many witnesses of the resurrection. After he rose from the dead, Jesus appeared at least ten times to those who knew him and more than 500 people at the same time. These appearances were not hallucinations; Jesus ate and talked with his followers and they touched his resurrected body.

* The resurrection is the only logical explanation for the transformation of the disciples. They abandoned and denied Jesus before his public trial, after their death they were discouraged and fearful. Even after his resurrection and their experience at Pentecost, these same discouraged, disappointed men and women were transformed by the mighty power of the risen Christ. On their behalf, they turned the world upside down. Many lost their lives for their faith, others were terribly persecuted. Their courageous behavior does not make sense unless his conviction that Jesus Christ was truly risen from the dead is a fact worth dying for.

* The resurrection is the only reasonable explanation for the beginning of the Christian movement. The Christian Church was born in the same city where Jesus was publicly executed and buried. The belief in a resurrected Jesus had to be authentic to take root in Jerusalem and grew to encompass the whole world. The Christian Church is now the largest institution that exists and has existed in the history of mankind. Clearly, this would have been impossible if the resurrection was a story.



To test more in depth the reality of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it will suffice to establish that truly was dead when they put in the grave, and then appeared full of life. ¬ To confirm more fully the force of this argument, we show that, in the pre ¬ present case, it was impossible any chicanery, and, finally, that if Jesus Christ had not really ¬ fado triumph of death, the world had become.


FIRST TEST

A - JESUS \u200b\u200bREALLY WAS KILLED WHEN THE CROSS FELL

1. San Juan, an eyewitness, says that Jesus died on the cross, and the three Evangelists give us the same testimony.

2. Moreover, it can not be doubted, if take account of the atrocious torture he suffered before being nailed on the cross, but rather, if anything can marvel is that it would have remained alive for three whole hours, the single crucifixion, according to the historian Josephus, was enough to cause him to die.

3. The soldiers who break His legs, refrained from doing so because they saw he was dead.

4. The launch which was at that time was enough to take the last breath of life.

5. Pilate gave the body of Jesus to Joseph of Arimathea, but under the official aserveración centurion that Jesus had actually died.

6. The Jews themselves While it was persuaded, and it is believed that would ensure proper care of the fact, before you save the tomb more so, to be precise, have not ceased to finish off his victim. Thus we see that neither the council, and the rabbis, not the Roman or Greek sophists, ever think to deny that Jesus was dead. Our own modern rationalists have never resorted to the childish assumption of a fictitious death of the Savior, and not even the same Renan managed to escape the force of that argument (2).


B - JESUS \u200b\u200bIS SHOWED IN TRUTH, FULL OF LIFE, AFTER HIS DEATH

1. This appears proved by numerous eyewitnesses who, having seen his Divine Master expire on the cross, he returned to see, not dreaming, not while sleeping, but in broad daylight and being in possession of his faculties, heard his words received their orders, touched and touched their flesh and wounds, and ate together with Him

2. This happened in the space of forty days and the most diverse circumstances, because it occurred near the tomb of Salvador, on the road to Emmaus, in the Upper Room, on the banks of the lake in the Mount of Olives, etc. Nor were they always the same people who saw him, but now are the pious women, now San Pedro, now the disciples of Emmaus, after the Apostles, except Thomas who refused to believe them, later the same with St. Thomas, who finally surrendered to the evidence, later seven apostles in lake shore, and finally, in Galilee he saw a contest of more than 500, between apostles and disciples, of whom most were still living when Paul appealed to the testimony. (1 Cor. XV, G.)

3. More giving exceptional authority to all these witnesses is that they will not hesitate to suffer death in witness to the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Yet these were the same that shortly before had been so hard to believe, and they had reached a refusal, in exchange for not giving up, the unanimous testimony of the other apostles, protesting that he would not believe if you have not managed to get their hands on the same sores Jesus.

It is therefore all evidence, the nature of these occurrences, the number and variety of witnesses and all the circumstances, the fact of the resurrection of Jesus Christ is so true and proven horn of his death .

Then, this miracle is absolutely incontestable.


SECOND TEST

A - THE APOSTLES ERAL ALL IMPOSSIBLE fraud in connection with the Savior's resurrection

I. COULD NOT HAVE INTENTION OF STEALING THE BODY OF JESUS \u200b\u200b

The disciples could not steal the body of Jesus Christ. "No man who gets into adventures ¬ ras, for extremely hazardous, with no really serious reasons, mostly when such izo can expect this interest, but on the contrary, it is completely ruinous to their interests. If they are, ¬ rivers which will be engaged, the thing is not only difficult but impossible. And yet, this has bríamos ¬ admit, possible to believe the hypothesis that the apostles had conceived the project which ascribed wickedness.

1 °. Had acted without reason. In effect, or the disciples believed in the coming resurrection of their Lord, or not believe, or were in doubt.

In the first case, the abduction of the body would have been absolutely useless. In the second what they did was to abandon the cause of a man in whom, as we assume, no longer had any faith. In the past, that was true, as is clear from the Gospel story, the simple good sense suggested they were on the lookout for events to shape their behavior after them.

Unless, therefore, they were fools, and nothing authorize us to make such an assumption, and that they were all together, could never even pass for thought, stealing the body of his Master.

2 º. On the contrary, had very powerful reasons to stay out of such release:

a. Some of them saw only enemies of Jesus, and so bitter, you just try in the most cruel, not stopping to take his life. Of consequence, by the Jews, they could expect nothing but insults, torture and even death. B.

From God, an avenger of sin, they had to fear the punishment reserved for the lie, blasphemy and ungodliness.
C.
In addition, his deception would be ascertained at the end, inevitably, and this in the most shameful and miserable. How uneducated, bad credit, no fortune could have, or even imagine, that could carry out the project more foolish than ever fit into a human head, which was to worship God, to an impostor crucified in Judea, and this in all nations of the world? D.

Finally, if no such resurrection, Jesus had not already been on, in the eyes of his disciples, but a trickster, and the guilty author of his shame and misery. And why such a man habríanse they so bravely exposed to all the punishments and penalties of this world and the next?


II. NI still want could have done

To be convinced of this, quickly enough to consider the nature and difficulties of such an undertaking.

The grave was dug in the rock, its entrance blocked by a heavy stone, which, in turn, was sealed and guarded by a large number of soldiers. Now, what means available to the apostles for theft? Only three can imagine, or violence, or corruption, or cunning. But in this case, the three impractical.

1. The violence: the apostles, whose shameful timidity could not be more striking, because they had just run away like cowards, leaving behind his Divine Master in the hour of his Passion, were not men to force a squad of soldiers, or break public seals, or this alone, but, to put in work like audacity, it was impossible to stay hidden or unpunished.

2. Corruption: what could have been co ¬ rromper to the guards, if ever was truly traditional extreme poverty? And the remarkable thing is that the case should have been bribing the soldiers there, in the same guard post, and to all at all, because the refusal of one would have sufficed to wreck the company. And these soldiers, were they sure of the mutual discretion one another were to be saved?

3. The ruse: this resource is even more difficult, even impossible. Which way would come to the tomb? Why an underground? And how or at what time they had opened in the rock, without attracting the attention of any guard? And once open how can then fill it to leave no trace of your work? And put into the tomb, had been quiet to strip the body of his shroud and make it very plegadito the shroud that covered the head, and, on top of everything, quedaríales humor yet to return the stone to your site, to avoid raising suspicion!

Or taken, perhaps, the ordinary? In this case had to be forced through between the soldiers break the seals, remove the stone, quietly dispose of the paintings, and sweat ¬ river bend, and then loaded with the Treasury, where they had been re ... Ah! And all this without making a sound, without anyone knowing about it! Will it be said that the guards were asleep? If this is why we come into con ¬ they had to sleep all, but not one to stay awake to meet the slogan and that his dream was so prodigiously profound that all that bustle of comings and goings, checked around and in the silence of the night still was not enough to rouse even one! "More than admit that everyone was asleep. In this case, how come you still do not look after the body had been stolen? How not to keep severely punished as infidels? Why Jews were obliged to give them money and lead them to accumulate ¬ saran to themselves, publishing their own shame? How do you explain that later, these same Jews who were continually reproaching him to the apostles to preach in the name of Jesus of Nazareth, not accuse them, even once they had stolen the body of their Master? They had spent two months after the resurrection, and when the apostles preached this great miracle, the Jews were content to punish and impose silence.

Turn, then, and stir the wickedness everywhere, which is everywhere to give the tie that she had prepared. How miserable are the tricks that he uses to escape the light of the evidence! And the truth of the resurrection can not be fought, without getting into open conflict with reason and good sense.


THIRD TEST

Granted by an impo ¬ sible, that the apostles had wanted to steal the body of Jesus and that, indeed, arrived to conduct business as senseless, yet they could not win another much greater difficulty, which was to persuade the world that "Jesus had resuci ¬ Tado and was God, even though, in reality, not in such a case, but a man condemned by human justice, and ignominious death on a cross. What obstacles, in effect, is presented for such a project!

1. º All accomplices, authors or abettors of this crime drama should have understood each other to prove his lie and commit to hold, even at the cost of the most atrocious tortures, and then only to ensure the success, indeed impossible, in such deception.

2. ° Also would have been necessary to entice the many disciples who had not entered into the plot, leading them to believe in apparitions of Jesus purely fake and inspired a faith so strong it was able to face the most horrible tortures, and even death itself, rather than allow ¬ Tirse doubt about the reality of the resurrection ¬ rection.

3. ° would have been necessary not only to deceive the nations that rejected the strict morality of Christ, who despised their poverty and insulted as madness his death on a cross, but also to the Jews who hated Jesus and, after having put to death ignominiously, had made every mistake impossible to barter such deception. Well, remember that on hearing the first sermon of St. Peter, became nothing less than 3000 Jews, and that in the 2 nd, this number increased to 5000.

4. ° In short, these men completely lacking as it can seduce the masses, they should become the real cause of the wonderful change the world, and that without divine aid, no other weight than their statements, as could not expect God to come miracles to confirm such criminal sham.

do not have power so successful because the evidence of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, especially when considered as a whole! And what else we could and if you give credence to facts so clear and so well established we deny it?


OBJECTION

Although the truth of the resurrection of Jesus Christ displayed proven way to leave no reasonable doubt, point out all the wicked several attempts to destroy the belief in this miracle. And certainly does not take much insight or to appreciate the force of such arguments.

1. Strauss works and sweats for explanation of the way Jesus' body disappeared from the tomb, and after many hardships, eventually take the most outlandish, to wit, that the body remained in the same grave.

This explanation has no more inconvenient than contradict the narrative of the four. Gospels and given the likelihood of slaps. If the body of Jesus was in the grave Why did not the Jews seized him and led around Jerusalem and the whole world, to destroy once the belief in the resurrection? The way

Renan seeks to disentangle themselves from this difficulty, no puede ser ni más cómoda ni menos aguda: «cuestión es ésta, dice, á más de ociosa in¬soluble, pues nunca llegará á conocerse este detalle» Lo cual no le impide que busque á este detalle una docena de explicaciones á cual más arriesgada: el rapto del cuerpo, pudo hacerse, según él, por los após¬toles, ó por los discípulos, los cuales pudieran haber¬lo escondido en Galilea; tal vez hasta por los mismos judíos, y quizás... quizás..., cosa por cierto nada inverosímil, por el propietario del jardín. Más aún; el que estuviera plegado el sudario parece indicar, no sin fundamento, que anduvo allí de por medio la mano de a woman. After rejecting all these explanations, and just attach the disappearance of the body of Jesus ... To pure chance!

2. Encounter the same difficulties with unbelievers to explain the unshakeable faith of the apostles at the resurrection. Strauss makes this confession: "If there is no miracle means of explaining the origin of faith in the resurrection of Jesus, we are forced to deny everything you have said, and to renounce our company."

addition, the same He rejects as implausible, the case of deception on the part of the apostles: "ever, says rightly, would have so much faith in a lie, until losing her life. "Finally, and perhaps persuaded that this was accomplished satisfaction to all the questions, he says without hesitation that the apostles were deceived, and that the cause of his deception had to be, neither more nor less imagination. So the resurrection of Jesus in this wicked, and Renan is the invention very wish-is simply the result of a hallucination, the effect of a runaway imagination. And so says, "as the apostles were in a big do this ¬ excitement took for reality was but what a simple game of imagination. Tan

free themselves assertions are refuted. If you still Faith deserves no witnesses who offer such guarantees of accuracy what things can ever be worthy of it?

If the resurrection of Jesus Christ has no foundation other than the hallucination, the apostles and disciples have believed to see what to see, hear what they heard and play what I did not touch, but the Gospel story has just the opposite: of course. .. For far from being predisposed to easily support the resurrection, what they did was shut in the upper room for fear of the Jews, and aban ¬ donated to the suspicion: so Forgotten brought predictions of its Master! Were reluctant to believe the testimony of the holy women, when Jesus appeared, they took him at first ghost, and did not leave his deception until they had touched and felt the body. Salvador and finely seen them eat with them. Do you see any trace here of where I could see the much vaunted hallucination

Because, even in this case, must be that all the disciples, absolutely everyone, had been victims of hallucination, even those slow of heart and cowardly that were going to Emmaus, and that first incredulous, Thomas, and five hundred disciples who witnessed Jesus' ascension. (1 Cor., XV, 6.) Not this alone, but such deception would had to be prolonged by four ¬ forty days, and repeated in the most diverse circumstances, and, finally, something perhaps more rare than the previous, it had to dispel once and forever the day of ascension phenomenon his turn, also purely imaginary!

More than that would be necessary to admit that the act of removing the stone from the tomb and the horror of the guards were equally pure illusion, that these guards were also blown away, that the empty tomb was not only in the imagination of the disciples ! The truth, which is a temptation to ask if they talk seriously writers such hypotheses hold.

But even assuming all this possible, it remains to explain how Christianity, which in this case is not an illusion foundation, it has been established, to regenerate the world v, in spite of all obstacles, to be perpetuated to us Through the centuries. The truth that only a miracle would be greater than all others.

Source: Statveritas and other


TOP

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Goldwell Colour Chart Online



"According to ancient tradition, this is a night of candle in honor of Lord and the vigil that takes place in it, commemorating the holy night in which the risen Lord is to be regarded as "the mother of all holy vigils." During the vigil, the church expected the Lord's resurrection and celebrates the sacraments of Christian initiation. "

"All of the Easter Vigil celebration must be done overnight. Therefore not be chosen nor so early that the Vigil begins before the start of the night, not long after it ends after dawn on Sunday. This rule must be strictly construed. Any abuse or contrary custom has been introduced, which signifies the celebration of the Easter Vigil at the time which usually take place the evening before Sunday Mass should be reproved. "


Didascalia In the Apostles we read: "All night long abide together in community, do not sleep, pass the whole night awake, praying and praying, reading the prophets, the psalms and the Gospel fear and trembling, in a climate of incessant appeal to the third watch of the night, after the Saturday after ... Offer your sacrifice. Rejoice then, eat, rejoice with joy and rejoicing because Christ is risen, as a token of your resurrection. " It may not be possible to make a total wakefulness in many parishes and Christian communities, but at least it would be reduced too much the duration of the vigil. In a society that night holiday celebrations are common, are we afraid to spend a night vigil with the Lord Jesus in his passage from death to life?


Vigil celebration

"The Easter Vigil is structured as follows: after the skylight and the Easter Proclamation (which are part of the first part of the Vigil), Holy Church contemplates the wonders God has done for his people since the beginning (part or Liturgy of the Word), to which, together with new members reborn by Baptism (third), is invited to the table prepared by the Lord to his people memorial of his death and resurrection, awaiting his second coming (fourth). Nobody is allowed to change at will the structure of the rite. "

On the structure of the Easter Vigil is good to keep in mind:


A. PART ONE: THE SKYLIGHT

- The right place for the skylight is outside the Church. Be prepared, a good fire (and not a small fire), for the blessing of new fire, whose light must be such as to dispel the darkness and illuminate the night.

- Prepare the Paschal Candle, which for the accuracy of the sign, must be of wax (not fictional), again each year (Easter is new and therefore should not be used Paschal candles from previous years), relatively large, so you can recall that the Lord Jesus light of the world. The blessing of the Paschal Candle will be done with the signs and words given by the Missal.

- be ordered from there the procession to the Church. The Paschal Candle is ahead, the people following the Paschal Candle on, during the procession is to be the only on. Just as the children of Israel in the wilderness, at night, were led by a pillar of fire, and Christians follow the risen Christ.

- At the door of the church, faithful individuals are lighting their candles from the Paschal Candle. It is a very expressive symbol of Christ's Passover Easter must also be ours, and all are called to share in his Light and Life.

- The procession enters the church to the cheers of Christ: "Light of Christ. Thanks be to God," and the lights of the temple was gradually going on.

- the first part concludes with the solemn singing of the Easter Proclamation: The "Exultet." It is a beautiful lyrical announcement of what will be the party tonight. A invitatory to the delight of the whole cosmos and the community, because it is the night life and Final Reconciliation.


B. PART TWO: THE CELEBRATION OF THE WORD

- This holy night, the readings are very careful consistency between them. They are presented as a key to understanding the Lord Jesus and the mystery and to understand the whole story of salvation from Christ. The close proclaim the Paschal Candle, symbol of Christ, and highlights it.

- "At the Easter Vigil of the Holy Night, proposed seven Old Testament readings which recall the wonders of God in salvation history, and two readings of the New, namely, the announcement of the resurrection as the three synoptic Gospels and the apostolic reading Christian baptism as the sacrament of the resurrection of Christ "The readings are accompanied by a psalm or song of meditation, which enhances their central idea in an atmosphere of prayer. Each block of reading and concludes with a prayer song. These sentences are very old, dating from S. VII and are taken from the Sacramentary Gelasian. Thus the structure of the Liturgy of the Word takes on a dialogue: God takes the initiative in the history of salvation, which reveals his plan of love is upon us and as it has been deployed throughout history. And we welcome your initiative to salvation, the Word of life and meditate on the heart following the example of Mary, the great helper of the plans of God and the hearer of the Word par excellence.

- Completion of the Old Testament, and to emphasize the passage from the Old to the New Testament, the singing of the hymn "Gloria" as they ring the bells, light the candles on the altar (which should be more numerous than usual) and placed flowers on the altar. After the singing of "Gloria", the priest says the opening prayer.

- Hence all take a seat and read the Epistle. At the end of it all stand and the priest intones three times the "Hallelujah", gradually raising his voice and repeating the assembly. The singing of "Hallelujah" may be repeated several times by assembly as a psalmist sings Psalm 117. Follows the announcement of the resurrection of the Lord's Gospel reading, the culmination of the entire liturgy of the Word. After have a brief homily.


C. PART THREE: BAPTISMAL LITURGY

- After listening to the Word of God, we celebrate the Easter sacraments. The mystery of the Passover of the Lord Jesus that we have proclaimed the readings and with which we have entered into communion by an attentive ear and a host of faith, we will now celebrate the sacramental signs.

- A sense of convenience pastoral tell each community if appropriate time watch it at night, to celebrate a baptism, especially adults. For kindergarten children, should take into account their situation and their relatives, to perhaps book the celebration of this sacrament for the morning Mass on Easter Sunday.

- Currently, the structure of the baptismal celebration: a.

The litany of the saints (if there will be baptism), invoking its protection over the to be baptized, and added to the list some more specific to the local Church, and also reflecting the names that will be imposed on the baptized . The litanies are sung standing, not kneeling. B.

Blessing Water: the long if baptismal font, and the short if there is not, nor will it have baptisms. Rather than bless water, bless God as Love in the history of salvation made by water, from the creation and passage through the Red Sea to the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan, today also asking water through his Spirit of life acting upon the baptized and the Church. This invocation of the Spirit can make the priest, if it sees fit by entering one or three times the Paschal Candle on the water. C.

Must eventually baptism (and confirmation when it is for adults who are baptized). D.

The whole community, with candles New hands on in making the renewal of baptismal promises, remembering one's baptism. E.

In this renewal is followed by the gesture of the spray, with a baptismal song. It is a symbolic gesture then for every Sunday of the year, but on Easter Sunday can be repeated as initial rite of the Eucharist which replaces the penitential rite.

f. The baptismal rite concludes with the universal prayer, with which the Christian people, starting with newly baptized adults, exercise "baptismal priesthood."


D. PART FOUR: THE EASTER EUCHARIST

- The Christian community, lit by the Word, rejuvenated by the baptismal water or memory, is now sitting at the table of the Passover holiday, which the Lord invites you to participate in his Body and Blood. With the Eucharist we end the fast of Lent: Jesus gives himself as food of eternal life to his Church.

- The Eucharist is the climax of the entire memorial. Everything up to this point should be brought to this direction, growing in intensity, "the celebration of the Eucharist is the climax of the vigil because Easter is the sacrament par excellence, the memorial of the sacrifice of the Cross, the presence of the risen Christ, the consummation of Christian initiation and foretaste of the eternal Easter " .

- Therefore "we must be very careful so that the Eucharistic liturgy is not made in haste. It is desirable that all the rites and words that accompany them achieve all their expressive power: the prayer of the faithful ... the procession of offerings, which should involve the neophytes, if any, the eucharistic prayer first, second or third, preferably sung, with its own embolism, Eucharistic communion, which is the moment of full participation in the mystery being celebrated "

" In the end before "you can go in peace, alleluia, alleluia" should be added, although not propose Missal, the singing of the "Regina Caeli" or another greeting Mother of the Risen One, heading toward his image. The song can be introduced with the following or similar words:

Easter Day in the Christian community, addressing the Mother of God, invited her to rejoice: Queen of Heaven, rejoice Hallelujah! So remember the joy of Mary and the resurrection of Jesus, and continues over time the "Rejoice!" to him by the angel at the Annunciation, to become the "cause of joy for all humanity. Salute to Mary our Mother singing the Regina Caeli.

Sources: Catholic University of Puerto Rico


TOP